Is propositional knowledge a necessary and sufficient mode of knowing truth, or does Integral Methodological Pluralism add necessary components?

Are these two modes of knowledge gathering:

The same with different names?
Different but complementary?
Different and opposed?

Inquiring minds both want to know -and don't want to know.

When I first saw the title of this post on GenSit I thought, "Oh no.  They've found me out!"

Ok, not really.  But if you have a chance, go read it - it's a good meditation on both the necessity of practice, and yet being careful not to hold the "practice" to an unnecessary state of perfection.