In case you haven't been tracking this, and you are interested in politics, and have some time (three prerequisites!), make sure to check out "Who owns God?" at Integral Options Cafe.
Who Owns God? Part 1
Who Owns God? Part 2
Who Owns God? Part 3
It's actually politics through the realm of Spiral Dynamics, but worth reading in any case.
What is valuable is the insight that the "God" that people believe in is related to their own level of growth, and that this has been mapped, via (hopefully) large scale and coherent statistical analyses.
I'm still skeptical (or perhaps confused) of this Tier 1- Tier 2 understanding.
Tier 1 is considered everyting the "memes" Green and below. Tier 2 is yellow and above.
To me, there still seems a confusion between a substantive and authentic "level of consciousness",be it green, orange, yellow - with the whole aspect of "meme", which really is a strictly cognitive development.
A level of conciousness is deeper than a cognition, deeper than a meme, so it looks like a conflation between a particular "meme" or world-view, with a level of consciousness.
|
|
||||||||
|
This Month
Recent Articles
Integral Views
Month Archive
Recent Photos
|
Who Owns God?
Comments
Re: Who Owns God?
by
WH
on Tue 07 Feb 2006 06:41 PM PST | Profile | Permanent Link
I agree with your confusion around Beck & Cowan's use of "Meme" for the worldview/developmental level. I prefer "worldview" to vMEME (this is how they use it in the book), which means "value Meme." They use the all-caps MEME to signify a meta-meme, a Meme that contains many other related memes. Poor choice on their part, I think.
The reason I prefer "worldview" over "developmental level" is that a vMEME contains elements from all quadrants, while a developmental level tends to be limited (in people's minds) to the individual, and usually the interiority of the individual. To me, a worldview can incorporate individual development, both interior and exterior, but also can include collective values (interior) and the social structures that contain them (exterior). The first tier / second tier distinction is somewhat arbitrary, except that a first tier person is "trapped" within their specific worldview. A second tier person is free to assume all the lower worldviews as needed. I do wish that Beck or Cowan would do an updated book on SD--one that includes Wilber's developmental lines through all the quadrants. But then Cowan thinks Wilber is full of sh!t, and Beck isn't Wilber's biggest fan since he started referring to SDi as a values line rather than an integral theory. -Bill Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: |
|||||||
|
|
||||||||