I left a comment over at Ideological Putty, on "happiness". What was surprising, was how definite an opinion I had on this topic, that I had never really coherently thought about, or put on paper.
At any rate, I'm reprinting the comment here, because, basically, this is my current opinion on happiness. I'm not cleaning up the comment for clarity either, so there are a couple of sentences that are confusing..
"Happiness is a learned process, and the learning process for happiness
is grounded in "correct" motive and emotional stances towards life.
These are MUCH more foundational for happiness than contemplative
stances in life. Meditation in this sense is helpful, but it is icing
on the cake, rather than the the parts of the cake (happiness) itself.
Happiness isn't much of a mystery anymore, actually.
a.
Every human is born with a certain baseline emotional modality,
predisposed towards harmony/disharmony, positivity/negativity, and
stablility/instability.
b. The first four years are formative in
either enhancing or debilitating this certain emotional baseline, in
the sense of belongingness/lovingness. Various forms of natural
wounding happen here.
c. The next 10 years, forming the rule
structure/ideation phase of life, develops a natural trust in ego/self,
rules/structure, or being enveloped in B.S. family rules, attitudes,
and actions, that again, form the basis of cognitive/motive "stances"
towards life, played out inside of one's ego.
d. The next seven
years determine the stance of engagement with life - this of course is
deeply influenced by the above - but here the "stance" towards life is
taken - openness, experimentation? Retreat, surrender? Fixedness or
flexibility? Very related to the sexual persona's success/failure in
sexual experiences.
e & f. The process of "working on
oneself", and "finding ones place in the world". In this process,
healing of previous "woundings" occur (and self-actualization) because
of internal lack of love/support, or internalization of various
action/belief stances that are - for lack of a better word - anti-life.
In this sense, 80% of the people you meet are "not happy", or
"not sane", in the sense of good mental health. (and of course, that is
"average" mental health, without getting into the possibility of
recognizing and living various spiritual truths). In this sense,
everyone is "the walking wounded".
E&F of course, can last for a long time, perhaps one's whole life.
But with an "integral" education, one realizes certain "living truths", or the secrets of life.
1. Take care of your health.
2. Maintain a positive attitude.
3. Develop a deep sense of faith and gratitude (in life, God, meditation, community, whatever)
4. Be open and available to new experiences, challenges ("he not busy being born is busy dying")
5. ENGAGE FULLY with life, in the sense of living life with MEANING,and CONFIDENCE, in actions and beliefs.
6.
While paradoxically, recognizing "humility" - that flexibility that
comes with loving your neighbors as yourself, recognizing that your
actions have only a limited influence, so "don't sweat the small
stuff", etc - which is paradoxical in a way, because part of "e" -
Engaging Fully - is CARING about the small stuff. A happy medium,
basically living the Alcoholics Anonymous creed. Use good judgment,
without being judgmental.
7. Find an occupation/way to express in
the world that agrees with you. Doesn't have to be "the soul's job",
although if that happens, great. But, something that agrees with you!
At
any rate, engaging in Step "e" and "f", raises a person to the outer
limits of the baseline in which "a" through "d" has given you in life.
In some cases, of course, a through d might have done such a job on a
person, in terms of derailing natural happiness, that chemicals may be
required while healing from the effects of a negative a through d.
That's why chemicals are always used as an adddition to the PRACTICE of
living well.
That's the theory of happiness.
Meditation
adds to happiness, in the sense of aiding the process of
fast-forwarding humanity's future evolution into deeper calm, bliss,
truth, etc.
But again, this is an extra on the Practice of happiness.
That's my view."
And:
"The hardest part is the psychological stuff we aren't aware of, at
least for me. The psychological scotomas we suffer from, that we are
blind to. These ostensibly are CAUSED by yourself, but at the same
time, is unknown to yourself. In cases like that, therapy is very
useful, as you can see - perhaps - how and why you are actively
destroying "practicing happiness"."
Any thoughts on this, by others? Who would agree that "happiness" is NOT some static state, but it is more a way of actively being in the world?
|
|
||||||||
|
This Month
Recent Articles
Integral Views
Month Archive
Recent Photos
|
On the Practice of Happiness
Comments
Re: On the Practice of Happiness
by
bob
on Thu 02 Mar 2006 09:35 PM PST | Profile | Permanent Link
So, not to be a big pain, but how do you define happiness? Is it distinct from satisfaction? Peace? Joy? Is it possible to be at peace but temporarily unhappy?
You might want to check out this blog: http://happinesspolicy.com/ and perhaps the new book "The Happiness Hypothesis" Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: |
|||||||
|
|
||||||||