As it seems he still isn't sure.

This makes me wonder how we (average informed people) pick sides on this important and critical issue.  Do we take Al Gore's (and the PRO) side? Do we take Michael Crichton's (and the CON) side? Do we take BOTH sides? If we do take BOTH sides, how do we INTEGRATE them?  These are the questions that I think we need to honestly ask ourselves before we decide and take sides on this issue. And this is the premise by which I started ZPod:CLIMATE CHANGE.

So I invite everyone to JOIN IN so we can all make ourselves more informed on CLIMATE CHANGE whichever side we choose to lean on to.

Now, this might be the C4 generating discussion - but at this point, we really should simply shut down this debate, since there is no scientific controversy at this point - there is only what are the best things to do.  So let's generate discussion, by dismissing the doubters!

And the obfuscators need to be treated like flat-earthers, because the possible effects are very worrisome.

At any rate, here is Pew Center site on Global Warming.

A new integral site, called Open Integral. 

Thanks to Bill for the heads up.

Of particular interest is the post around "cultish" behavior.  Quite a neutral analysis, not over the top on any side.

From the University of Texas:

Not being a procrastinator is essential for those who live "integrally", employing skills in different dimensions.

I'm curious.  Has anyone ever experienced a tremendous CHANGE in your own procrastination tendencies? 

With a caveat here, that you have had the same procrastination tendencies for at least 5 years. Has anyone changed, in terms of those tendencies, if there is an established 5 year pattern in adulthood?

If so - what changed this for you?